Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 3:05:58 GMT -5
The with a bunch of redirects that are not s s s and you change them to s which is the permanent redirect status code it sure looks like Google organic search traffic sends more visits to those redirected pages or to the target of the redirected pages. Why would that be if it didnt matter in the first place Is it just a bunch of correlation but not causation results because it looks way too consistent Or is there something else going on here Many folks for example pointed to the fact that the word PageRank might be the operative thing here.
In fact this is one of the things that I would say personally. When Greece Mobile Number List Google says they all pass PageRank or they all pass the same amount of PageRank remember PageRank is Googles original ranking formula from that Larry and Sergey developed in college. It is not a comprehensive holistic representation of every possible signal that is in Googles ranking algorithm or of them. system could possibly interpret. Maybe the machine learning systems that are in place at Google for spam or for relevancy or for importance for trust whatever they are have determined that s are in fact the better one to use or should be interpreted as a stronger signal. So youve got to be careful when reading a statement like this.
It does generate a lot of discussion in our field but its not the only case. This has happened for a decade and a half now in the SEO world where people from Google say things publicly. When they dont get it right For example you might remember a couple years ago The mobilefriendly update will be bigger than Panda and Penguin combined. Then of course the mobile update rolled out what was that June of and we all scratched out heads and went.
In fact this is one of the things that I would say personally. When Greece Mobile Number List Google says they all pass PageRank or they all pass the same amount of PageRank remember PageRank is Googles original ranking formula from that Larry and Sergey developed in college. It is not a comprehensive holistic representation of every possible signal that is in Googles ranking algorithm or of them. system could possibly interpret. Maybe the machine learning systems that are in place at Google for spam or for relevancy or for importance for trust whatever they are have determined that s are in fact the better one to use or should be interpreted as a stronger signal. So youve got to be careful when reading a statement like this.
It does generate a lot of discussion in our field but its not the only case. This has happened for a decade and a half now in the SEO world where people from Google say things publicly. When they dont get it right For example you might remember a couple years ago The mobilefriendly update will be bigger than Panda and Penguin combined. Then of course the mobile update rolled out what was that June of and we all scratched out heads and went.